موضوع عن سوريا باللغة الانجليزية

تعبير تقرير برجراف فقرة برزنتيشن بحث موضوع ملخص جاهز باللغة الانجليزية  كتابة انشاء عبارات حكم اقوال تعبير بالانجليزي عن  تقرير جاهز سهل بسيط قطعة معلومات عامة شاملة بسيطة مبسط نبذة عن الاقتصاد السكان جمل عن بلادي اسم كلمة معنى كيف تكتب مترجم رحلة عن مقال جمهورية دولة حول  تكاليف المعيشه السياحة في  للطلاب عرض للصف السادس للصف الاول للصف الثاني للصف الثالث للصف الرابع للصف الخامس للصف السادس للصف السابع للصف الثامن للصف التاسع للصف العاشر  ابتدائي جمل  سهل وقصير معالم  موقع  تقرير عن تراث بالانجليزي ابي موضوع  ابراج خمس جمل قديما  أبرز المناطق السياحية مختصر حول الحياة والعادات والتقاليد فى  لمحة تعريفية بالانجلش تلخيص قصير كلمة تحدث  تقرير انجليزي عن اي دوله مقدمة خاتمة  information about   paragraph  presentation  location  my country uae كم عدد سكان  مدن  الوجهات العرب المسافرون نقاط الاهتمام مساحة تحدث جغرافية جغرافيا  عبارات شعر قصيدة مؤثر كلام قصير مترجم بالعربي  شكل عام موضوع مؤثر اللغات الرسمية ديانة  اسماء مدن  المناطق الريفيه الشعب الجنس رئيس لغتها الرسمية قوانين موقع  الوطن 

policy

The government, made up of the Shiite-based Bass Party headed by Bashar al-Assad, had been stable for 40 years, but it has been in question for two years with the Syrian people's uprising. The conflict is directly threatening the government, but the government has been supported by the UN since Syria submitted the first formal declaration of its chemical weapons on October 24, which brings it into international conformity. It seems that the international authorities do not want to see the end of this government because it is indeed a barrier against religious extremists. The latter took the revolution on their own: while the conflict was at the base insurrectional, it degenerated into ethnic conflict with the appearance of the Free Syrian Army (ASL). The latter, led by extremists such as Salafists, jihadists or other Islamists who seized the conflict, in a structure called the Syrian national coalition, tried in turn to overthrow the power. Then, the ASL was gradually removed from the conflict for the benefit of the extremist groups mentioned above, who then try to overthrow the power in turn to establish their principles at the head of the Syrian state. As in other countries in the region, international bodies such as the UN seem to prefer to see the countries be led by an iron fist by their leaders rather than see them recover by the extremists, perceived as enemies . That is why the UN prefers to keep the government stable: it will obviously play on the reality of things, even if the people are opposed to that. For the UN, maintaining President Bashar would not grow extremists: it would gag instead, at least in Syria. For all these reasons, the government is unstable because of the conflict that exists on its territory, but it seems hard to imagine that international bodies will not act to help it when needed: in this, there is when even some stability.

The internal conflicts in the country are epitomized by the daily clashes between the two fronts, consisting of the regular army of Bashar al-Assad on one side (including Mukhabarats and Hezbollah militants), and his opponents of the other (composed of the Syrian national coalition with the ASL, the Salafists, the djijadists and Islamists). Ethnic tensions are therefore at their peak, since the conflict is mainly based on opposition between Shiites and Sunnis.

Syria has undergone significant socio-economic changes since the regime that began in 1970, changes that are partly responsible for the popular uprising. Indeed, Hafez, Bashar al-Assad's father, built a network of loyalties with the wealthiest and best-placed people in the country, which contradicted the questioning of the heritage and power of the big bourgeoisie. previous regimes. Thus, the influence of large landowners has continued to grow, placing them in touch with the government. The high ranking of the country, linked to the state, were able to increase their power and wealth, thanks to government decrees that allowed them to work more easily. This facilitated the enrichment of the better-off, while the socio-economic conditions of the country deteriorated. Indeed, the quality of goods and services has declined in parallel, particularly in health and education with the rise of private institutions. With the resumption of the government by Bashar, the situation has worsened. The public sector has collapsed, with the public sector now concentrating 70% of economic activities. On the eve of the uprising in March 2011, the unemployment rate was 14.9% according to official figures, 20% according to other sources. It mainly affected young people. Syrians living below the poverty line were also numerous. It is therefore these deplorable conditions, marked by very important social inequalities and an economic situation benefiting only the wealthiest in connection with the State, which were at the origin of the conflict. At present, the situation has not really changed theoretically, since the government still in place has not changed anything, but because of the conflict, we can not really analyze the normal living conditions. Socio-economically, in addition to what has just been developed, it is obvious that the country is going through a crisis because of the clashes that are taking place all over the country, which prevent the country from progressing economically and causing a great deal of damage to the country. population.

As previously developed, it is clear that corruption is commonplace in this country: since 1970 and the beginning of the authoritarian regime of the El-Assad family, the high-ranking and wealthy landowners have strong links with the State and thus benefit measures favoring them, to the detriment of the population. This situation has created the current situation of insecurity, and the terrorist and criminal acts currently taking place in the country on the part of the two parties who are fighting each other.

Syria does not currently have any conflict outside its borders, because it is completely absorbed by its own internal conflict. Nevertheless, its conflict has many repercussions on its neighboring countries. To illustrate this, we can take the case of Lebanon, totally outdated, on the one hand by the huge influx of Syrian refugees (now representing a quarter of the population on Lebanese land!) And on the other by the conflict. mirror that exists within it, opposing Shiites and Sunnis. Syria, for its part, may fear the intervention of countries interested in the conflict and wanting to see one of the two sides triumph.

We can indeed group in two parts the countries that could intervene in the conflict:

- countries in favor of the regime in place, such as a number of European countries, the United States.

- countries wanting to see the fall of the regime, such as Turkey, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, the United Arab Emirates, Kuwait.

We see here that some of the Middle East countries want to see the fall of the regime, this is not unrelated to their desire to see an extremist group take power.

Syria, in addition to its internal problems, has great concerns about its relations with territories outside its borders.